Your possible targets:
Beau
Geoff
greekhouse
inkarnit
nettebarr
yickit
I’m still thinking through scenarios on how to fix quick-draw voting. Favoring those in power might be a good way to go, though that still forces us to establish an order.
Nothing’s coming to mind other than the last kill being able to choose, and yes, they’re biased, but this might introduce the right kind of strategy, and not the wrong kind.
Cutthroat Junction 
Will and I vote for DG.
Accepted. Boom bitches.
Pretty good fake out, amirite?
I’m calling absolute bs on this.
That’s fine, you wouldn’t be the first.
I’m not sure what would be BS here. If anything, I think these guys got a little fancy with their plan, but there was a long time between this and their actual votes, and they did both eventually vote for the person they suggested they were going to vote for.
I meant that they were not actual votes, if that isn’t a head deek or bs I don’t know what else it is.
A head deek doesn’t bother me. It’s on each person to pay attention to the game, I think.
It wasn’t a real decoy. I wasn’t paying attention. I don’t know what I would have had to gain by incorrectly voting for someone.
I considered that, since it was so much stranger an idea to me than playing it straight.
I VOTE YICKIT
Oh you
Ok, maybe not since DG isn’t up. So not accepted.
This is confusing… this was supposed to be in response to my acceptance of KG’s influence without realizing it isn’t valid. Anyway, so my yickit vote should stand.
I vote Yickit
along with Dread Pirate I will vote Greekhouse
I VOTE FOR GREEKHOUSE
KG, try joining me, silly!
I almost screwed it up. I tried real hard to screw it up. But I got there.
It’s the thought that counts!
I vote Yickit
Hey guys. I’m here now. For like 5 minutes. What am I supposed to be doing?
Vote Yickit
That doesn’t feel right.
That’s because it’s good for you. It’s like broccoli.
Why would it?
Ok, I’ve got to go soon. And seeing that DG influenced AMR last time, that seems like a good idea.
SO AMR AND I VOTE FOR GREEKHOUSE.
I’m pretty sure AMR won’t be challenging you on this one.
Clearly, I didn’t read far enough down the last thread.
I Challenge.
Oh crap. Novak’s a 6 and I’m a 20.
Novak wins, I concede.
Group of 8:
So we have a problem. DP and KG both have their votes locked. We have two options:
1. Vote Greekhouse out as planned. We then must turn on each other next round.
2. Go along with them and vote out Yickit. That would give us Dread Pirate and KG to vote/influence tomorrow.
I’ll defer to the rest of the group, having already tossed a vote on Greek, since I was trying to be quick.
Alright, I’m away for the day! See you all tomorrow morning!
Seems like we should go with the Yickit plan.
That seems silly. I mean most of these games do, but the company pirate floats something, and suddenly I’m the target.
You are only being made the target because they voted for you. You are the only possible other option than greekhouse. If we vote greekhouse we are voting against each other next day no matter what. If we vote for you, we can then eliminate DP, greekhouse, or kg next and hopefully stack some to get 2 or 3 of them in a row. It sucks for you for sure though. I am undecided what way to go here and therefore have not cast my vote yet. I guess it depends on how I think things would go next week if we kill greek.
This is true. If you think the group will stay together fine. Doesn’t seem like there is much going that way though lately. I’ve made my moves, so I can’t really do much at this point.
It appears to me that the group would stay together but… I don’t like betraying people. That is kinda the name of the game though… or at least the website. WHAT DO I DO!?
My opinion – Yickit started the game with two non-votes which is what (even though I earned a non-vote this morning) I was planning to use as my argument once we had to turn on each other – i was going to argue that Yickit or Novack (also with 2 non votes) should be the first to go. Maybe we just have to start that earlier than expected? I definitely prefer the ability to remove DP and KG moving forward and keeping the 7 of us together.
Thoughts?
My thoughts echo yours.
I hate to admit it but that might be the best plan… It certainly lets DP and greek both be targets next round which we won’t get otherwise. Getting the top ranked card out is, unfortunately, going to require someone to make a sacrifice. It looks like yickit has been made that sacrifice by the “others.”
I’ll just add that 10am is pretty tough for me. I had moves both days queued but when things happen so fast I couldn’t get there and don’t really think those things should really be held against me. I’ve adjusted lately.
Pure evil, but I really like him.
I think you guys are punch drunk.
It’s the logical conclusion of playing a game where no one has read the rules.
What the shit is going on here?
vote yickit
Thanks for showing up. Everyone hates you, me, and KG, so if you manage to live, don’t forget that. They’ve been using you as a patsy!
I woke up super early so I went in early and am home for like another hour or so before I’m off to the Ravens game!
I’ve noticed they’ve been using me. This is the first time I’ve been able to vote or do anything meaningful at all!
What card do you have greekhouse?
Joker.
Giving up that information at this point could sway votes… might be worth it for you.
You could stop accepting influence!
I might do that tomorrow, but I thought I’d be dead by the time I got home. I didn’t dream I would have survived two days!
WINE to NIBBISH
Okay no voting allowed now until nibbish votes, right?
Yep. nibs has to vote next, and must vote for someone who’s not yickit.
Well Novak, they’re already planning to turn on you. If you join us tomorrow we only need one more person to form a new majority. If Beau or Geoff get to the end you guys know they’ll win anyway.
I think I may have found the angle for avoiding too many speed votes. Each person is allowed just two or three Influence attempts for the entire game. Would that have kept some of you from coming out firing each time?
Potentially. But do you think the game is harmed more by being a speed race at the beginning or by having limited influence attempts?
It might have kept me from using influence every time, but I probably still would have voted right away.
Actually given my number, I probably would have used influence anyway.
2 or 3 seems like a really low number considering we still have 8 rounds to go after this one.
Well yeah I would say it would need to be more like 4 influences, but the idea is sound.
I kind of like the idea of having a relatively low number of influences. It makes them a valuable resource. That varies the game instead of having the same strategy every time.
I can see that.
Given that influence is almost the only way to figure out card numbers, limiting that aspect seems like it just takes the cards out of the card game.
Well, even in this game we only have four known cards of the 11 players remaining.
I think three per person over the course of the game is quite a few, particularly if the in-person games are more likely to start with 6-10 people than fifteen.
If you do limit, I would think it would have to be tied to the number of players.
3 influences in a 8-player game (6 rounds) is different than in a 15-player game like this one.
I’m with you here, Kage. I think three is the max I want to allow, but I could add something like “for a more chaotic game, add to the max Influences.”
We will of course play out this game as it’s been played so far.
I feel like some sort of punishment for a failed influence would be appropriate. What if a failed influence meant that the other person got to pick your vote? Or that you couldn’t vote for the person you tried to vote for?
Isn’t having your number shown to everyone punishment enough? Or maybe a failed influence automatically puts you in the “in power” crew.
I VOTE GREEKHOUSE
I had little choice. It was either Greek, or a purposefully ineffectual vote.
I tend to think that we should go after Yickit here.
You should have voted Beau. My nemesis strikes again!
Okay votes are open again
I will say we have several “quiet” “alliance” members who are free to influence others. Voting against ourselves isn’t the only option no matter what Will, Geoff and Beau are saying.
Also I’m out of wine. Might have to go home. Thanks nibbs.
What can I say? I was thirsty.
Well I guess I didn’t leave you much in that skin anyway.
But we can only vote for the people in power.
Good point. Just looked down at my notes. I thought one of them hadn’t voted yet. Either way the fellowship has broken it seems. I’ve made my moves, but I played them the way I said I would. So there is that.
I have to run to a meeting with my CEO – will be back in ~hour.
Sounds wolfy
Annette, Colin, Geoff.
We get to choose who goes out, not only in this round, but probably the next few as well. I feel like it’s in our best interests to work together here toward whatever we think is the ideal outcome.
Who is this Colin? Which letter does it get after the first name?
inkarnit = Colin Wolfson, who is a different person from Colin Woolston.
From my perspective their names are where their similarities end.
Err, is that a good thing or a bad thing? LOL
Well when you have to go three letters deep…
Woolston is not nearly as cool a name as Wolfson. So judge that way.
Alphabetically? Done.
I’m listening.
Do you agree that those are the options? Do you have a strong feeling one way or the other? I guess we’ll probably wait until Geoff gets back to decide anything, but is there anything I overlooked?
I love that you talk above about how you always vote early, but here you haven’t voted yet.
I was referring to in this game when my middling number was revealed early and I had to protect against influence.
Voting early certainly isn’t always necessary, but I felt like it was for most days this time.
But you could have been influenced on this day, and you still didn’t vote early.
I had established the pattern. People weren’t going to influence me because I always go right at the start so they might lose their ability to influence.
Yeah… I don’t know how much I like all this pressure lol. The earlier votes were easy.
So how do we decide this. If we eliminate greekhouse now, our targets next week become Beau, Novak, nibbish, and yickit. We have to decide who to elbow out of the group. If we vote yickit now, our targets next week become DP, greekhouse, and kg2005, allowing us to keep the full alliance in play without breaking it up.
Next week? We’re not playing tomorrow?
Sorry, it’s not Friday yet. Wishful thinking.
Tomorrow. He’s been saying “week” all game long.
Have I? What’s wrong with me?
Except for, you know, breaking it up by killing yickit. Oh, and Geoff’s post above saying that he was ready to go for Novak next. Oh, and Beau agreeing with that post. But besides that, yes.
I meant to echo his thoughts on yickit. I have no long term feelings about Novak
True, killing yickit breaks it up a little. I’m sure yickit will choose to leave the alliance if we do that. But I doubt others will when there will be other targets available. Does Novak leave our alliance to join you because he knows two people in the alliance are ready to eliminate him after it breaks up? I don’t know, but doubtful considering we all know we have to kill each other eventually.
Also if you kill me I am certain to leave the alliance.
Can a Dread Pirate call Parley?
Someone edit my post to replace “next week” with “tomorrow” please 😛
“whole alliance” Dude. Harsh.
“Mostly full alliance” then? LOL sorry. Just how I see it. You will notice my vote has still not been cast though. I am mulling it over.
That response below was me. I don’t like being run over by a bus.
I agree.
If we eliminate yickit, everyone works to take down Pirate or kg (or both!) and we have enough allies from our old group to withstand influence from the Outsiders.
If we eliminate greek, yickit would probably join with us, and we could maybe add kg or the Pirate (or both!) and have enough in our new group to withstand influence from the others.
All I’ve ever wanted is to be invited. The door was closed by the time I showed up.
So we are essentially deciding if we want to take half the alliance and join with the one or both of the Others.
Annette – thoughts?
yickit – if we vote for greek, how would you see it playing out afterwards?
kg2005 – any input here?
DP – which evil force do you prefer to work with?
I think those are our options. The question is whether breaking from the original alliance is worth it. I’m not advocating either way, yet. But being that we’re in the position to decide the vote, it would be silly not to look at the options.
I think Kg and I have worked well together in the past. Even though his vote was for me. I don’t like being run over by a bus though. Should have read through dgs posts more carefully earlier.
hm? what posts?
Sorry, I’ve got attorneys running around acting like their asses are on fire. What the hell are we doing here?
Annette, we are determining how the 4 of us remaining should vote. Should we kill yickit, kill greekhouse, make Beau tie with greekhouse, or spread our votes so greekhouse dies but none of us are “in power” tomorrow.
DG just a joke about being forgotten
I’m leaning Yickit, although I don’t like it. I’m not big on the spreading the vote around. Yickit leaves us more options going forward, right?
I tend to agree with Annette.
If you guys think killing yickit is the right move, I will back that up.
DG, you were the first one I asked to ally with so I will probably go with what you think is the best move. We could even all 4 vote for someone else entirely and force a tie between greek and them!
I would love to watch the three of you convince the fourth to vote for themselves under those circumstances.
Oh, looking at the people available the only one we could all 4 vote on would be Beau.
And I didn’t say we were going to do that! It was just one of the “all the options” available is all lol
The only non-Greek/yickit player we could force a tie with would be Beau.
An option, I guess, but not one I think is particularly great.
What about not voting? Is that an option? Or does that make us look like cheapskates?
We could spread our votes around so that none of us are vulnerable tomorrow. We’d probably be targeted by at least some people if we did that.
I could vote for you, you could vote for me, Geoff can vote for Annette, and Annette can vote for Geoff. Would that make people target us?
you can’t vote for me, you could vote for Beau.
I don’t know how people would read it, but it’s already been brought up when other alliance members have been perceived to have dodged votes (yickit, novak, perhaps others), so people would notice, certainly.
Perhaps it wouldn’t matter if they noticed. Next round we would not be able to be killed and people would need to join with us to save themselves. Would that create 3 factions temporarily? Sure. It would be our faction of 4, the “others” faction of 3, and the original alliance faction of 4… of which all 4 would be killable and would be looking for reasons to stay with us.
I’ll be heading out to work in a little over a half hour. DG has editing privileges. Do I need to get them to anyone else in addition?
Obviously, this will be the last “day” today. We’ll start at the usual time tomorrow. To field yickit’s comment about this being a difficult start time, it would be a hell of a thing to change now, though in the future we can talk about the optimum start time for games where time is of the essence.
I have to go for a while around 6pm Central. Probably should give someone else privileges, just so things can be current.
Alright. Who knows their way around a spreadsheet? Pete? kg? Both?
I’m gone in a half an hour, or I’d take it.
I can help if needed.
I’m not complaining, just explaining nonvotes. I know 7am is tough for people as well. I just tend to have most of my dept meetings around 10 here in the middle of the week.
Ah, I understand.
7:00 a.m. is rough.
You could just set it for a random time without telling anyone what that time is. Of course, DG will surely be the first one to find it.
That’s a not-bad idea. When we get the email we’ll know it’s live.
KG just got a shitload of points somehow.
Looks legit.
I can’t speak for KG, but if yickit goes tonight, then I’ll go after nibbish tomorrow out of deference to new-found allies (any of DG, inkarnit, nette, or Geoff) who helped with the vote.
nibbish sounds like he actually wants to vote yickit too. He was just forced to note vote for him heh
If Yickit goes tonight, then what are you going to do to me tomorrow? Influence me? Unlikely.
I voted Greek.
You’re right, I’m a total idiot. First rule of any game.
Alright, guys, I’m off to work. While I can’t get to the spreadsheet there, I can get to this site so I’ll field questions if I must.
If this thing ends in a tie, here’s how it’ll work. Rather than wait ages for each person to respond or not to the tiebreaker, email me saying “If the tiebreaker comes to me, I choose to [kill X, kill Y, or abstain and let it fall to the next person]. Cool?
cool
Well, I’m extremely interested in what happens the rest of the evening. See you all bright and early tomorrow morning.
Ok I am back. Give me a couple minutes to read and catch up.
Okay, read up buddy, but it sounds it has been determined killing yickit is the best move.
Funny – I just made the opposite argument below. We will have to decide I guess.
Here are my thoughts:
I have no allegiance to Beau other than respect for him getting an initial group together.
I have no allegiance to Yickit nor novack for their early multiple non-votes.
I do have allegiance to the other 4 team members – Inkarnit, Nibbish, DG, and Nettebarr
I do not like the “quick vote” aspect of the game and I have no problem leaving those who did quick vote in trouble for having done so.
At this point I think it makes the most sense for the 4 of who have not voted to vote inconsequentially (split between Beau, Colin, Nette, and myself) and let the 4 greekhouse voters go up for the next round.
At that point I am happy to consider my self “aligned” with this group of 4 late votes plus any DP and KG if they would like to so consider.
Thoughts?
I kinda feel the same as you, but along with that is the allegiance to people such as DG and Annette, who both think voting for yickit makes the most sense. I see the arguments for all sides though.
DG and Annette can decide for themselves if they want to join or avoid the majority. I either vote for an original 8 team member and put myself in the majority and *possibly* avoid becoming a target or I vote inconsequential hope to gain some new allies and *possibly* make myself a target sooner down the road than I otherwise would anyway. I’ve got to make the best play for myself.
My only question is whether the new alliance gets us anything that the old alliance doesn’t offer.
Perhaps this nucleus of four is enough to make that work, although since we’re doing this in the open, we will have to work to make that group safe.
The fact that this nucleus of 4 is invulnerable next round is pretty strong. No one could vote for us even if all 7 decided they should. But I don’t think it would be us against 7. There would be people that want to vote with us. I think Nibbish would be smart to stay with us holding the wine card and I know DP would like in too even if no one else did.
Like I mentioned above, there would be factions of 4, 4, and 3… and the other 4 that isn’t our 4 would have all 4 up for elmination, making the next round 4, 3, and 3. Sure, 3+3 > 4 but I would hazard a guess that some of each group of 3 would rather work with us than against us.
I’ll add though that I don’t think the quick voters should be left out to dry. We had determined last round that greekhouse was the target. Along with that, though, was that we needed Beau to influence DP in that vote so we would have a target next round too. DP was quicker than Beau in this case which changed the entire scope of the round. So the quick votes for greekhouse were actually the initial plan that got screwed up a bit.
We can argue the right or wrong of whether they should be left to dry – the fact is Im not in a position to snipe as soon as the new post is released so I am at a disadvantage when voting early is the best move – I have no problem (and actually think its good for the game) to be able to to turn that advantage into a disadvantage.
What do I gain if I vote Yickit? I’ve already outed my intention to move against Novack and the group of 8 is thin if not ready to implode here soon. I gain nothing and put myself at risk.
I vote inconsequential and yes it may cost me with some jury members if I get to then end – but it may get me jury respect as well. Most importantly it leaves me safe and gives me at least as much and possibly more alliance forward than what I have now.
Is any of my logic there flawed?
No, none of your logic is flawed. I don’t think anyone’s logic is flawed here to be honest. Each options has its merits. They all could work. But who are we most afraid of and which option gives us the best position to eliminate that person or persons?
If you vote yickit, you gain a few days where the original alliance chases down DP or kg instead of trying to get our votes into a majority.
If you think that isn’t worth as much as what we gain by not being vulnerable in the next vote, that’s a discussion, but it’s not as if voting yickit gains us nothing.
I agree 100% – I think the 4 of us being untouchable and saving Yickit (along with DP and KG from the majority) has more value than putting ourselves into the majority and killing Yickit.
I guess it depends on influences after the next round but… it seems to me it’s the same amount of immune time one way or the other. Voting yickit is a vote to betray whereas voting inconsequentially is a safe vote to kill greekhouse. If you want to go as long as possible before betraying someone, option b is better than option a. I think the possibilities of success are similar regardless.
It sounds like we need to hear from yickit here. I would think yickit would join us, making it a group of 5 since we saved him from the alliance that was willing to kill him. A group of 5 against two groups of 3. One of those groups of 3 has a dead member next round too… making it 5 allied against 5 non-allied.
Not to mention, voting Yickit right now still leaves us greek, as well as DP and KG to focus on. That’s three rounds before we have to move on each other.
Not necessarily Annette. If we can’t force one of them to vote for the losing person each round, we have to turn on each other anyway. And Geoff could force the hand here. He voted inconsequential. How does that impact the possibilities now? I know we can still kill greek or yickit, but does his vote change how things play out afterwards at all?
You want to punish those who quick vote yet you have allegiance to DG?
I thought that was funny too.. but DG didn’t quick vote this time!
I don’t want to punish those specific individuals who voted quickly. I want to introduce the possibility of quick voting being a bad move into the game.
My allegiance to DG is that he was part of the original 8 and has voted every time and has not made an obvious vote to avoid the majority. In other words he has been a more consistent and honorable player than I have so far. (Although in my defense my missed vote was due to being up past 1AM working and not waking up at 7AM in time to vote)
Yeah I think one of your non-votes was only because the vote was decided before you got on. This is probably the case for most people.
However – Yickit non voted the first two votes of the game.
Novak non voted twice when he was participating in the conversation and had “agreed” to vote with the group.
Those both bothered me – but I said nothing at the time waiting to bring it up when it was time for the 8 to turn inward – this quick voting dynamic of the game hastened that.
I have also been in the majority every time and have voted in favor for our group without hesitation. In fact, my quick vote this time is essentially what you implied I should do when the previous round ended.
Not that it means you should ally with me. Obviously new parties have to form now.
Yeah, I’m not saying the quick vote thing is wrong at all. I don’t like the quick vote but that’s how this game has been made to be played. I have no bones to pick with anyone. Just playing the game!
I agree with what you said 100%.
Ill put it out there – while I can see Beau being an easy target next round because of his point value – I do respect him organizing the original group of 8. I would support voting for Novak next round (assuming we let the current 4 Greekhouse votes be the majority)
If Greekhouse is eliminated, then I agree to vote Novak in the next round. That puts me in danger of elimination the round after that (provided Novak is eliminated), but I would hope you all would view it as a sign of good faith and continue to work with me.
I’ve made my arguments – here is my admittedly inconsequential vote to hopefully start the dominoes to end today.
I VOTE FOR INKARNIT because he won’t vote for himself so no way he can get to 4 votes.
Hey, that was a lot of fun to read through. I’m pretty excited to team up with whomever wants me.
EVERYBODY wants you . . . we’re just not sure about working with you.
If you team up with me,that means you can’t vote for me anymore.
The votes for you were just my way of flirting, you understand.
Indeed I do. My comment above was more of a lament than anything else.
Someone should just influence me to do something. I’ll probably accept!
So… Annette and Brooks. What do you guys wanna do?
Brooks said something earlier about being unavailable around this time. I am assuming he will be back. I’m still mostly pro Yickit. How about you?
I’m mostly pro inconsequential vote… But any two of us can make this decision right now. Two votes for Greek and he’s done. Two for yickit with anything else from the third and it’s done.
I suppose since we can’t end things without Brooks anyway we should wait until he’s back to make a decision. But to be clear, you are for killing yickit this round then going after greek, DP, or kg next round?
Yeah. You could still vote for someone else and let Brooks decide.
That’s true. But would that make me a target later for being indecisive? Would I be punished for not wanting to betray yickit?
I VOTE YICKIT
Okay… so we still can’t finalize this without Brooks then. If I vote Greek, we have to wait for Brooks. If I vote yickit, we have to wait for Brooks. I think I’m going to wait for Brooks…
Oh, hai everybody!
I’m back now.
HAI! Now what do we do? It’s a tie vote 4-4 yickit and greek.
If we throw our votes does a tie change anything?
It certainly takes longer to figure out who’s dead. It also makes things more interesting as to who is vulnerable tomorrow.
Then it comes down to tie breaker votes where we are supposed to tell Kelly who we want dead or whether we would abstain if the decision comes to us.
right, but since the whole point of not voting for one of those two was to avoid being vulnerable tomorrow, I would guess that you, me, and Geoff all abstained.
I think I might vote for Geoff since he voted for me. Then you can decide? lol
More importantly though, does that help or hurt our chances? We would not be actively saving yickit so he is less likely to want to be our friend and we are not actively saving greek so he is less likely to be our friend too. And would the original alliance stay our friend since we didn’t throw in with them?
I’d say killing greekhouse would give you a lot more friends than enemies.
Really? Aren’t you on the “kill yickit” team WITH greekhouse?
If you kill greekhouse then you have Will and I as allies. Yickit would probably be pretty happy about it. Plus all of the people that you’re upsetting by openly considering stabbing them in the back will be up for the vote. I just call ’em like I see ’em.
I’m getting donuts and chicken. So I’m out for a while. I hope brooks and the earliest Colin choose the other fella. Either way I’ll be back in a bit.
alright, I have to leave again.
vote greekhouse
Err, I have to leave work now… And it’s down to me? Umm.
I VOTE GEOFF BECAUSE HE VOTED FOR ME!
And also because I’m not ready to betray you yickit. You didn’t do nuffin
Wolfiest vote ever!
My last name IS Wolfson. Also it makes no sense at this point to vote Greek since he’s dead anyway.
Like I mentioned, I will vote Novak in the morning (should inkarnit kill Greekhouse here). Please join me if you believe in liberty!
Dammit, didn’t mean to have “post-vote” talk. Sorry guys…
Not sure if it’s officially post vote until it’s tabulated but… Meh.
A quick scan of the conversation shows me that Geoff is attempting to line up future targets, and is using whatever convenient reasoning is at hand. He’s latched onto people who have 2 non-votes, since that excludes him. It’s a pretty bogus reason (though admittedly no more bogus than the fact that 8 of us happened to be around at the right time on day 1 to set up a group) given the chaos that is these days. My first non-vote came when we were discussing whether I should use influence to create a second target on day 1 and a couple others swooped in and removed that option. My second non-vote came today when I was attending a church service for my deceased sister and missed an entire “day”, so… yeah. I don’t favor voting anyone out for missing votes when things have happened so quickly.
That said, I’ve been a team player throughout. I used my influence to target both Free and DPWY. Meanwhile, Geoff has been anything but. I think you should all leave me alone tomorrow, but even if I go out next, everyone, target Geoff at the first opportunity.
From the length of this I’m pretty sure you started typing before my vote was entered lol
Before today I always voted with the group except the one day the vote was done before I was even out of bed. How have i not been a team player?
How do you explain your two non-votes – both of which I recall you being part of the conversation so you were around to vote – it appears to me you conveniently just waited too long to vote – if I am wrong please let me know.
I do give you credit for using your influence twice to help the team.
I am open to reasons to not vote for you tomorrow – you have heard my arguments for why I think people should vote for you.
(If this is over the line strategy talk forgive me – I won’t post anymore until tomorrow morning)
Looks like greekhouse has been eliminated. Everyone email Kelly with your choice of who you would like to kill if your number comes up (or if you would like to abstain from changing your vote).
Huh? Why email Kelly? There’s no tie right?
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
K
Wait, that doesn’t make sense. It’s not a tie. You can email Kelly anyway just to confuse him.
greekhouse is still dead, right? Hard to follow without the spread in front of me, but was it 5-4-1-1-1 or something?
Anyway, I’m thinking 9am AND 10:30 if another thing like today happens (Bret was assassinated today. TODAY. Does that even seem possible anymore?) but I’m thinking it’ll be more complicated than that; tomorrow I work at 1 Central so that would probably be it even if we get to two days done, though we’ll play it by ear.
Dead as the hookers he poops on.
Wait. WHAT?
Woah, woah, woah. I would never kill a hooker.
No one said you kill them. Just that you poop on them when they’re dead.
I mean, if I found a dead one lying around, then maybe I’d poop on her. It’s just not the same, though.
That wouldn’t be very smart though. Then your DNA would be all over them and you’d be a suspect.
So what you’re saying is that pooping on dead hookers is not a great idea?
Huh.
Well if tomorrow morning shakes out like this it will take hours ago let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
Also, WHAT IS GREEK’S POWER?
He always finds travel-sized toiletries in his pockets.
I asked for that kind of answer.
I truly L’dOL at this.
greek was #17 Brutus. My wife, best friend and my brother’s cards were killed today. Huh.
Which card are you?
Nevermind you took too long. Found it. Apparently DG is wearing a Kelly mask. What number is Geoff on?
Geoff is on the #16 Cicero card.
Heh. Geoff is weak.
If any of you are ever in DC and enjoy Donuts, Fried Chicken and Beer GBD (http://gbdchickendoughnuts.com/) is legit.